AMD FirePro V4900 vs ATI FirePro V4800

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V4900 and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 480 vs 400
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1927 vs 1671
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.303 vs 5.886
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 392.237 vs 321.782
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.597 vs 0.529
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.874 vs 14.184
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 56.777
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 1512
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 2211
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3326
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 1512
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 2211
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3326

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800

• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1204 vs 1006
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 320

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V4900
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1006 1204
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	320 456
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1927 1671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.303 5.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	392.237 321.782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.597 0.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.874 14.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.818 56.777
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3753 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7745 3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3753 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7745 3326

Compare specifications (specs)