AMD FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V4900 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 513 MHz
• Around 36% higher pipelines: 480 vs 352
• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 722.3 gflops
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 152 Watt
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.874 vs 17.065
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 46.591
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 3104
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3316
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 3104
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000

• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 22.57 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more maximum memory size: 2560 MB vs 1 GB
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1934 vs 990
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 vs 312
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7358 vs 1928
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.451 vs 6.303
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 511.131 vs 392.237
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.925 vs 0.597
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2602 vs 1747
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2602 vs 1747

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V4900
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	990 1934
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 388
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1928 7358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.303 16.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	392.237 511.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.597 1.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.874 17.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.818 46.591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3753 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7745 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3753 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7745 3316

Compare specifications (specs)