AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W2100 and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 435.2 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 856 vs 728
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 277
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3716 vs 1818
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.438 vs 6.367
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.646 vs 118.389
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.991 vs 0.396
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.794 vs 7.921
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.338 vs 9.393
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1494 vs 1227
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2329 vs 1745
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2261
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1494 vs 1227
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2329 vs 1745
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2261

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• 9.8x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 400 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	856 728
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 277
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 1818
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.438 6.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	289.646 118.389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.991 0.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.794 7.921
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.338 9.393
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 2261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 2261

Compare specifications (specs)