AMD FirePro W4170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 800x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6460 vs 4492
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.502 vs 12.582
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 April 2014 vs 27 November 2013 |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 vs 4492 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 vs 12.582 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 18% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1751 vs 1041
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 211
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 2802
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 2802
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2689
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2689
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1751 vs 1041 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 2689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 2689 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4170M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1041 | 1751 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 | 4492 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 | 12.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2689 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2689 | 3332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W4170M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Mars | GK106 |
Launch date | 28 April 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1043 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |