AMD FirePro W4170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 863 MHz
- 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.502 vs 8.832
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 April 2014 vs 30 May 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz vs 863 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 vs 8.832 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 92% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2004 vs 1046
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 211
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7240 vs 6460
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2802
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2802
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2689
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2689
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2004 vs 1046 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 vs 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7240 vs 6460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 2689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 2689 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4170M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1046 | 2004 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 289 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 | 7240 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 | 8.832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2689 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2689 | 3333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.935 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W4170M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Mars | GK106 |
Launch date | 28 April 2014 | 30 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1043 | 1046 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 863 MHz |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 55.23 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Verde Drivers |