AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4300 and AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 834 MHz
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5460 MHz
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.57 vs 778.867
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 December 2015 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed 930 MHz vs 834 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 5460 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 828.57 vs 778.867

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 93.41 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,989 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
  • Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4916 vs 2799
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 619
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23548 vs 11008
  • Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.272 vs 31.528
  • Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.051 vs 2.986
  • Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.535 vs 59.153
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.811 vs 152.484
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 93.41 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1792 vs 768
Floating-point performance 2,989 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4916 vs 2799
PassMark - G2D Mark 715 vs 619
Geekbench - OpenCL 23548 vs 11008
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 56.272 vs 31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.051 vs 2.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 65.535 vs 59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 336.811 vs 152.484

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4300
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2799
4916
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
619
715
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
11008
23548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.528
56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
828.57
778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.986
5.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
59.153
65.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
152.484
336.811
Name AMD FirePro W4300 AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark 2799 4916
PassMark - G2D Mark 619 715
Geekbench - OpenCL 11008 23548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.528 56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 828.57 778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.986 5.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 59.153 65.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 152.484 336.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 17597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 17597

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro W4300 AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Bonaire Grenada
Launch date 1 December 2015 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 436 439
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series

Technical info

Core clock speed 930 MHz 834 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,428 gflops 2,989 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1792
Texture fill rate 44.64 GTexel / s 93.41 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 2,080 million 6,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 171 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s 174.7 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 5460 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
TrueAudio
ZeroCore