AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4300 and AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 834 MHz
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5460 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.57 vs 778.867
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 834 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5460 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.57 vs 778.867 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 93.41 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,989 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4916 vs 2799
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 619
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23548 vs 11008
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.272 vs 31.528
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.051 vs 2.986
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.535 vs 59.153
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.811 vs 152.484
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 93.41 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2,989 gflops vs 1,428 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4916 vs 2799 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 715 vs 619 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23548 vs 11008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.272 vs 31.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.051 vs 2.986 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.535 vs 59.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.811 vs 152.484 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4300
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4300 | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2799 | 4916 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 | 715 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11008 | 23548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.528 | 56.272 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.57 | 778.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.986 | 5.051 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.153 | 65.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 152.484 | 336.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W4300 | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Bonaire | Grenada |
Launch date | 1 December 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 436 | 439 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 834 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 2,989 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 GTexel / s | 93.41 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 171 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 174.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5460 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore |