AMD FirePro W5100 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5100 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 44.64 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 768 vs 40
- 13.7x better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2988 vs 1186
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 536 vs 394
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11683 vs 5053
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4397 vs 2095
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 3285
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4397 vs 2095
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 March 2014 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2988 vs 1186 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 vs 394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 vs 5053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4397 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4397 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5100
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W5100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2988 | 1186 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 | 394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 | 5053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.199 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4397 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4397 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W5100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Bonaire | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 31 March 2014 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 646 | 649 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 392 million |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 171 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |