AMD FirePro W5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 244 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 534 vs 486
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 32.378
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 vs 132.363
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 March 2014 vs 9 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 244 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 534 vs 486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.354 vs 32.378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.258 vs 132.363 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 49.4 billion / sec vs 44.64 GTexel / s
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 1,581.1 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4622 vs 2992
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15124 vs 11686
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.048 vs 35.15
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 872.651 vs 838.518
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.338 vs 3.199
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 vs 4397
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3688
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 vs 4397
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3688
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion / sec vs 44.64 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops vs 1,428 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4622 vs 2992 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15124 vs 11686 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 vs 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 vs 838.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 vs 3.199 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 vs 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 vs 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2992 | 4622 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 534 | 486 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11686 | 15124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.15 | 40.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 | 872.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.199 | 4.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.354 | 32.378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.258 | 132.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4397 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4397 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Bonaire | GF110 |
Launch date | 31 March 2014 | 9 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 646 | 647 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $289.88 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1544 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 244 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 171 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin and One 8-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |