AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W6150M and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3340
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43598 vs 14269
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,613 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3340 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 vs 14269 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 2698
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 2698
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 286
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 2358
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 2698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 2698 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 vs 286 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 vs 2358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W6150M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3340 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 | 14269 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 460 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 | 3032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4468 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Saturn | Tobago |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 661 | 662 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 165 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 104.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 6500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |