AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W8100 and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 131.8 GTexel / s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 4,219 gflops vs 4,096 gflops
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7333 vs 6173
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 727 vs 679
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.339 vs 89.187
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2333.922 vs 1434.496
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.816 vs 7.656
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.45 vs 87.459
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 June 2014 vs 8 October 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 GTexel / s vs 128.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops vs 4,096 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7333 vs 6173 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 727 vs 679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 vs 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 vs 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 vs 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 vs 87.459 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 vs 440.107
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 5494
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 5494
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 vs 440.107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 vs 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 vs 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W8100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W8100 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7333 | 6173 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 727 | 679 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34705 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 440.107 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5494 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5494 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W8100 | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Hawaii | Tahiti |
Launch date | 23 June 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 395 | 394 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 GTexel / s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 4,313 million |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 275 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |