AMD FirePro W8100 versus AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W8100 and AMD Radeon R9 280X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W8100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 131.8 GTexel / s versus 128.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,219 gflops versus 4,096 gflops
- Environ 14% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 220 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7333 versus 6171
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 727 versus 679
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.339 versus 89.187
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2333.922 versus 1434.496
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.816 versus 7.656
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.45 versus 87.459
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 June 2014 versus 8 October 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 131.8 GTexel / s versus 128.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,219 gflops versus 4,096 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7333 versus 6171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 727 versus 679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 versus 89.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 versus 1434.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 versus 7.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 versus 87.459 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 versus 440.107
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 versus 5494
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 versus 5494
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 versus 440.107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 versus 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 versus 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3349 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W8100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro W8100 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7333 | 6171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 727 | 679 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34705 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 | 89.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 | 1434.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 | 7.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 | 87.459 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 440.107 | 493.57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5494 | 9603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5494 | 9603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro W8100 | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Hawaii | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 23 June 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 395 | 394 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 824 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,219 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 131.8 GTexel / s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,200 million | 4,313 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 279 mm | 275 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 512 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro W8100 avec des autres
AMDFirePro W8100 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
AMDFirePro W8100 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
AMDFirePro W8100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
AMDFirePro W8100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
AMDFirePro W8100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000
AMDFirePro W8100 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
