AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 1708.3x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 5.4x better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 144 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 58 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 790 MHz
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 44
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1062 vs 220
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6091 vs 5892
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1686
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1686
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 26 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops vs 144 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 58 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 790 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 vs 44 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1062 vs 220 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6091 vs 5892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1686 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 730 MHz
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 44 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1062 | 220 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6091 | 5892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 1686 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Topaz | G94 |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 26 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 982 | 1583 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
Price now | $79.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1360 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 144 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 58 Watt |
Transistor count | 834 M | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 25.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 790 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
CUDA |