AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 1575.6x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1688
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1688
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 907 vs 897
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1688 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 907 vs 897 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 694
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1116
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 270 vs 200
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 vs 200 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 | 270 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 907 | 897 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Oland |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1254 | 1256 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | N / A |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1150 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon 9000
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTS
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
AMDRadeon 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
