AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 1575.6x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1688
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1688
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 8 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1688 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 694
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1116
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 204
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 271 vs 204 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 899 vs 895 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 204 | 271 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 895 | 899 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5091 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | Oland |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1254 | 1256 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 780 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | N / A |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1150 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |