AMD Radeon 630 vs ATI FirePro V5800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and ATI FirePro V5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 690 MHz
- 1412.3x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 74 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 2135
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 2135
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3319
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3319
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9651 vs 3099
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1269 vs 1176
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 26 April 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 690 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 74 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 vs 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 vs 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3352 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 vs 3099 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1269 vs 1176 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V5800
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 272 vs 221
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 512 |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 vs 221 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V5800
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | ATI FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3352 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 3099 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 272 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1269 | 1176 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | ATI FirePro V5800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | Juniper |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 26 April 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 759 | 868 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 690 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 74 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 229 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
