AMD Radeon 630 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 706.2x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 2475
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 2475
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 958
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 958
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2304
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2304
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9651 vs 4462
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 55.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 2304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 2304 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 vs 4462 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 221
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 1269
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 221 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 vs 1269 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 2304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 2304 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 4462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 569 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1269 | 1461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 759 | 789 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 48 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 55.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 189 million |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
