AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 808.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 48.2 billion / sec
- 2.1x more pipelines: 512 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 236 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 58% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1107 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2697
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2697
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3325
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3325
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 224 vs 57
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1514 vs 1278
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 16 June 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 48.2 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 240 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 236 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1107 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3325 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 224 vs 57 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1514 vs 1278 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21396 vs 8605
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 21396 vs 8605 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3325 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8605 | 21396 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 224 | 57 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1514 | 1278 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | GT200 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 16 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 734 | 1038 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $522.78 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.98 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1296 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 240 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 48.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 236 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 141.7 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1107 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon X700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 430
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 710
