AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 411.5x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 1680
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 1680 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1218 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 3467
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 3467
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1218 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 3467 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 3467 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 1680 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8605 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 224 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1514 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 6 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 734 | 672 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1557 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 140.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon X700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 430
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 710
