AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 411.5x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 1680
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 1680 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1218 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 3467
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 3467
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1218 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 3467 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 3467 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 1680 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1272 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 6 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 757 | 692 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1557 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 140.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
