AMD Radeon E8860 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8860 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8860

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 37 Watt vs 64 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 900x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 367
• 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26300 vs 4487
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.395 vs 12.582
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 529.248 vs 364.463
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.683 vs 1.254
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.86 vs 23.499
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 vs 3332
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 vs 3332

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Around 84% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 25 GTexel / s
• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1753 vs 1686
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 vs 15.803
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1246
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1655
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1246
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1655

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8860
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1686 1753
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	436 367
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	26300 4487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.395 12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	529.248 364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.683 1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.803 18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	47.86 23.499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1246 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1655 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4345 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1246 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1655 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4345 3332

Compare specifications (specs)