AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R7 M460

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and AMD Radeon R7 M460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

AMD Radeon R7 M460

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 864.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
3.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.321 vs 19.679
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 vs 358.673
Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.499 vs 1.572
Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 vs 30.024
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 vs 85.168

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 October 2017 vs 15 May 2016
Core clock speed	1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops vs 864.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.321 vs 19.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	924.953 vs 358.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.499 vs 1.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	52.632 vs 30.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	97.705 vs 85.168

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M460

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.321

19.679

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

924.953

358.673

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.499

1.572

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

52.632

30.024

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

97.705

85.168

Name	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM	AMD Radeon R7 M460
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.321	19.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	924.953	358.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.499	1.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	52.632	30.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	97.705	85.168
PassMark - G3D Mark		1072
PassMark - G2D Mark		205
Geekbench - OpenCL		4999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1767
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		2772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1767
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		2772

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM	AMD Radeon R7 M460
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Lexa	Meso
Launch date	3 October 2017	15 May 2016
Place in performance rating	1239	1242
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1125 MHz
Core clock speed	1124 MHz	1100 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	864.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	384
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	27 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory		0