AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
3.2x more core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 350 MHz
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 vs 340.911
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.499 vs 1.785
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 vs 20.414
3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 vs 29.514

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 October 2017 vs 1 September 2017
Core clock speed	1124 MHz vs 350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 24
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	924.953 vs 340.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.499 vs 1.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	52.632 vs 20.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	97.705 vs 29.514

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.491 vs 27.321

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.491 vs 27.321

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.321

27.491

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

924.953

340.911

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.499

1.785

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

52.632

20.414

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

97.705

29.514

Name	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM	Intel UHD Graphics 630
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.321	27.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	924.953	340.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.499	1.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	52.632	20.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	97.705	29.514
PassMark - G3D Mark		1243
PassMark - G2D Mark		301
Geekbench - OpenCL		4641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		420

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM	Intel UHD Graphics 630
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 9.5
Code name	Lexa	Coffee Lake GT2
Launch date	3 October 2017	1 September 2017
Place in performance rating	1239	1240
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1200 MHz
Core clock speed	1124 MHz	350 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	460.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	512	24
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	28.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync