AMD Radeon E9171 MCM versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 3.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1124 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1219 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 39.01 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 21.3x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 24
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,248 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 versus 340.911
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.499 versus 1.785
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 versus 20.414
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 versus 29.514
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2017 versus 1 September 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1124 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1219 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.01 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,248 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 versus 340.911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 versus 1.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 versus 20.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 versus 29.514 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 40 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.491 versus 27.321
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 40 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.491 versus 27.321 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.321 | 27.491 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 | 340.911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 | 1.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 | 20.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 | 29.514 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4641 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Lexa | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2017 | 1 September 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1239 | 1240 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1219 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1124 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,248 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 24 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.01 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon E9171 MCM avec des autres
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9100 IGP
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
IntelHD Graphics 630
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
