AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD FirePro V7900

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 16% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,856.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 151 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 14.134
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 676.409
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 1.309
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 36.678
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 171.25
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 2996
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 2996

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900

• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 58.0 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 896
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2344
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.281 14.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	785.276 676.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.951 1.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.944 36.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	196.307 171.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3354

Compare specifications (specs)