AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI FireGL V8650

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

ATI FireGL V8650

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 688 MHz
16.6x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
7.2x more pipelines: 2304 vs 320
13.3x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1736 MHz

Launch date	27 September 2016 vs 14 May 2007
Core clock speed	1120 MHz vs 688 MHz
Texture fill rate	182.3 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 320
Floating-point performance	5,834 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 1736 MHz

Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8650

Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3208
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3208

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3208
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3208

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3208

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3208

3357

Name	AMD Radeon E9550 MXM	ATI FireGL V8650
Geekbench - OpenCL	36624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	112.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	96.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	507.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3208	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3208	3357
PassMark - G3D Mark		550
PassMark - G2D Mark		637

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E9550 MXM	ATI FireGL V8650
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale
Code name	Ellesmere	R600
Launch date	27 September 2016	14 May 2007
Place in performance rating	495	434
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,799
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1266 MHz
Core clock speed	1120 MHz	688 MHz
Floating-point performance	5,834 gflops	440.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	80 nm
Pipelines	2304	320
Texture fill rate	182.3 GTexel / s	11.01 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	720 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		254 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB / s	111.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1736 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR4