AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1468 vs 690
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1468 vs 690
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 June 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1468 vs 690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1468 vs 690 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 444 MHz
- Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 6.7 billion / sec vs 3.55 GTexel / s
- Around 51% better floating-point performance: 215.04 gflops vs 142.08 gflops
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 237
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 117
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1875 vs 587
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 859 vs 415
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 859 vs 415
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 719 vs 646
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 719 vs 646
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 444 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.7 billion / sec vs 3.55 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 215.04 gflops vs 142.08 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 523 vs 237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 117 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1875 vs 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 859 vs 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 859 vs 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 719 vs 646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 719 vs 646 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 237 | 523 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 117 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 587 | 1875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 415 | 859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 415 | 859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 646 | 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 646 | 719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1468 | 690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1468 | 690 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 172.058 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.944 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | WinterPark | GF108 |
Launch date | 20 June 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1560 | 1563 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 444 MHz | 1120 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 142.08 gflops | 215.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 3.55 GTexel / s | 6.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,180 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |