AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1468 vs 690
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1468 vs 690
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 June 2011 vs 3 September 2010
Pipelines 160 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1468 vs 690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1468 vs 690

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 444 MHz
  • Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 6.7 billion / sec vs 3.55 GTexel / s
  • Around 51% better floating-point performance: 215.04 gflops vs 142.08 gflops
  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 237
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 117
  • 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1875 vs 587
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 859 vs 415
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 859 vs 415
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 719 vs 646
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 719 vs 646
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1120 MHz vs 444 MHz
Texture fill rate 6.7 billion / sec vs 3.55 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 215.04 gflops vs 142.08 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 523 vs 237
PassMark - G2D Mark 174 vs 117
Geekbench - OpenCL 1875 vs 587
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 859 vs 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 859 vs 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 719 vs 646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 719 vs 646

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
237
523
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
117
174
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
587
1875
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
415
859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
415
859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
646
719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
646
719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1468
690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1468
690
Name AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
PassMark - G3D Mark 237 523
PassMark - G2D Mark 117 174
Geekbench - OpenCL 587 1875
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 415 859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 415 859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 646 719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 646 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1468 690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1468 690
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 172.058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 13.944

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Fermi
Code name WinterPark GF108
Launch date 20 June 2011 3 September 2010
Place in performance rating 1560 1563
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 444 MHz 1120 MHz
Floating-point performance 142.08 gflops 215.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 160 96
Texture fill rate 3.55 GTexel / s 6.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 23 Watt
Transistor count 1,180 million 585 million
CUDA cores 96

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus