AMD Radeon HD 6510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6510 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7845 vs 4263
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 480 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 518.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7845 vs 4263 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 16.1 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2837 vs 1970
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2837 vs 1970
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2551
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2551
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2837 vs 1970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2837 vs 1970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 2551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 2551 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6510 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1970 | 2837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1970 | 2837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2551 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2551 | 3349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7845 | 4263 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1214 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.965 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1699 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6510 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Turks | GF106 |
Launch date | 14 May 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1222 | 1223 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 16.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 1,170 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |