AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs AMD Radeon HD 6510
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and AMD Radeon HD 6510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10853 vs 7845
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 14 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops vs 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10853 vs 7845 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6510
- Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1970 vs 1850
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2551 vs 2112
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1970 vs 1850
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2551 vs 2112
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1970 vs 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2551 vs 2112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1970 vs 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2551 vs 2112 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6510
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M375 | AMD Radeon HD 6510 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 970 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10853 | 7845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.547 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.994 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 142.872 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 1970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2112 | 2551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 1970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2112 | 2551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M375 | AMD Radeon HD 6510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Tropo | Turks |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 14 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1243 | 1246 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 716 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1334 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |