AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs AMD Radeon HD 6510

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and AMD Radeon HD 6510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2.6x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10853 vs 7845
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 14 May 2011
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 40.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 480
Floating-point performance 1,299 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 10853 vs 7845

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6510

  • Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 1100 MHz
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1970 vs 1850
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2551 vs 2112
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1970 vs 1850
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2551 vs 2112
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 1334 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1970 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2551 vs 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1970 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2551 vs 2112

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6510

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10853
7845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
1970
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2112
2551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
1970
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2112
2551
Name AMD Radeon R9 M375 AMD Radeon HD 6510
PassMark - G3D Mark 970
PassMark - G2D Mark 162
Geekbench - OpenCL 10853 7845
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 29.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 272.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 142.872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1850 1970
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2112 2551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1850 1970
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2112 2551

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M375 AMD Radeon HD 6510

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Tropo Turks
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 14 May 2011
Place in performance rating 1243 1246
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1015 MHz
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,299 gflops 624.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 640 480
Texture fill rate 40.6 GTexel / s 15.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,500 million 716 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 39 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 165 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 11.2 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 16 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz 1334 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore