AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs AMD Radeon HD 6510
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and AMD Radeon HD 6510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10289 vs 7845
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 14 May 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops vs 624.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10289 vs 7845 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6510
- Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1970 vs 1850
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2551 vs 2112
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1970 vs 1850
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2551 vs 2112
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1970 vs 1850 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2551 vs 2112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1970 vs 1850 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2551 vs 2112 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6510
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M375 | AMD Radeon HD 6510 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 973 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10289 | 7845 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.547 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.024 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.994 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 142.872 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2112 | 2551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2112 | 2551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M375 | AMD Radeon HD 6510 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Tropo | Turks |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 14 May 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1220 | 1222 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 716 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 165 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1334 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M375 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6510
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745A
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
