AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs AMD Radeon HD 6510
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and AMD Radeon HD 6510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 17.16 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 2551
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 2551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 December 2015 vs 14 May 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 2551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 2551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6510
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7845 vs 5688
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1970 vs 1775
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1970 vs 1775
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 620 MHz |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7845 vs 5688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1970 vs 1775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1970 vs 1775 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6510
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | AMD Radeon HD 6510 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5688 | 7845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 2551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 2551 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M260X | AMD Radeon HD 6510 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Opal | Turks |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 6 December 2015 | 14 May 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1219 | 1222 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 716 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 165 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1334 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260X with others
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDRadeon HD 6510
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745A
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
IntelHD Graphics 630
