AMD Radeon HD 6570 versus ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6570 and ATI Radeon HD 5670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.6 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 400
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 624.0 gflops versus 620.0 gflops
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1553 versus 590
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.278 versus 3.914
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 versus 184.557
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.464 versus 0.319
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 versus 12.627
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 versus 27.325
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 versus 2113
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 versus 2113
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2011 versus 14 January 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 versus 400 |
Performance á point flottant | 624.0 gflops versus 620.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1553 versus 590 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 versus 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 versus 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 versus 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 versus 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 versus 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 versus 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 versus 2113 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 775 MHz versus 650 MHz
- 4.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 versus 547
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 versus 217
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 versus 1296
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1129 versus 1044
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 versus 1296
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1129 versus 1044
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 versus 547 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 versus 217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 versus 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1129 versus 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 versus 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1129 versus 1044 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 547 | 801 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 289 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1553 | 590 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 2113 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 6570 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Thames | Redwood |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2011 | 14 January 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | $119 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1424 | 1425 |
Prix maintenant | $49.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 624.0 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 400 |
Stream Processors | 480 | 400 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 627 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
DualGraphics |