NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 691 vs 551
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 217
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1704 vs 1564
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 4.278
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 vs 7 February 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 691 vs 551 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 vs 217 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1704 vs 1564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 vs 4.278 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
- 2x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 111.269
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.464 vs 0.399
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 vs 7.769
- 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 vs 9.522
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 1211
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 976
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1720
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 1211
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 976
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1720
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 vs 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 vs 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 vs 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 vs 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 vs 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 vs 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 vs 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 vs 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 1720 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 510 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 691 | 551 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | 217 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1704 | 1564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 | 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 111.269 | 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.399 | 0.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.769 | 13.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.522 | 59.183 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 | 2716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 510 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Thames |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 | 7 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $79 |
Place in performance rating | 1430 | 1432 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 716 million |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 28.8 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |