NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 692 vs 550
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 216
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1708 vs 1550
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 4.278

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• 2x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 111.269
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.464 vs 0.399
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 vs 7.769
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 vs 9.522
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 1211
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 976
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1720
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 1211
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 976
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1720

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	692 550
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	287 216
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1708 1550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.809 4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.269 255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.399 0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.769 13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.522 59.183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2716

Compare specifications (specs)