NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 692 vs 550
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 216
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1706 vs 1550
  • Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 4.278
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 October 2012 vs 7 February 2011
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 692 vs 550
PassMark - G2D Mark 288 vs 216
Geekbench - OpenCL 1706 vs 1550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.809 vs 4.278

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

  • Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
  • 2x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 111.269
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.464 vs 0.399
  • Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 vs 7.769
  • 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 vs 9.522
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 1211
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 976
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1720
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 1211
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 976
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1720
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
Pipelines 480 vs 192
Floating-point performance 624.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 255.525 vs 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.464 vs 0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.633 vs 7.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 59.183 vs 9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1296 vs 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1044 vs 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2716 vs 1720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1296 vs 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1044 vs 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2716 vs 1720

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
692
550
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
288
216
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1706
1550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.809
4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
111.269
255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.399
0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7.769
13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9.522
59.183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1211
1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
976
1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1211
1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
976
1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
2716
Name NVIDIA NVS 510 AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark 692 550
PassMark - G2D Mark 288 216
Geekbench - OpenCL 1706 1550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.809 4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 111.269 255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.399 0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.769 13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 9.522 59.183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1211 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 976 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1720 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1211 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 976 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1720 2716
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 846

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA NVS 510 AMD Radeon HD 6570

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale 2
Code name GK107 Thames
Launch date 23 October 2012 7 February 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $449 $79
Place in performance rating 1430 1432
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series
Price now $49.99
Value for money (0-100) 19.92

Technical info

Core clock speed 797 MHz
Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops 624.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 192 480
Texture fill rate 12.75 GTexel / s 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 40 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 716 million
Boost clock speed 650 MHz
Stream Processors 480

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 160 mm 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCIe 2.1 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB / s 28.8 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 900 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)