NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 38% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 557
• 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5400 vs 1547
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 4.278
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 59.183

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 158
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 165.904
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 927
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1349
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 927
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1165 557
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	158 218
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5400 1547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.872 4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.904 255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.813 59.183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1291 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	927 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1349 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1291 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	927 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1349 2716

Compare specifications (specs)