NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 551
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4583 vs 1564
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 4.278
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 59.183
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 vs 7 February 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 vs 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 vs 1564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 vs 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 vs 59.183 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 158
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 165.904
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 927
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1349
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 927
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1349
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 vs 165.904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 vs 1291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 vs 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 1349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 vs 1291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 vs 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 1349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | 551 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 217 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 | 1564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | 59.183 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 | 2716 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Thames |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 | 7 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1429 | 1432 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 650 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 40 Watt |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Transistor count | 716 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |