AMD Radeon HD 6570 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6570 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6570
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 15.6 GTexel / s versus 7.8 billion / sec
- 5x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 96
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 624.0 gflops versus 249.6 gflops
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 900 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 551 versus 536
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 versus 176
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.278 versus 4.25
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 versus 929
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 versus 1524
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 versus 929
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 versus 1524
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s versus 7.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 480 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 624.0 gflops versus 249.6 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 551 versus 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 versus 176 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 versus 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 versus 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 versus 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 versus 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 versus 1524 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Environ 14% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 40 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2012 versus 1564
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1210 versus 1044
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 versus 1044
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2012 versus 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1210 versus 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1210 versus 1044 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 551 | 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1564 | 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 1524 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Thames | GF106 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2011 | 15 January 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1432 | 1433 |
Prix maintenant | $49.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 624.0 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 96 |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 1300 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |