AMD Radeon HD 6670 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6670 and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 86 Watt
• Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1905 vs 1039
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 1757
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 1757

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750

• Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 720 vs 480
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
• 4.4x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1168 vs 724
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 247
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.384 vs 4.861
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 vs 235.463
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.679 vs 0.463
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 vs 15.918
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.346 vs 38.551
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 vs 1564
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 vs 1564

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6670
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 1168
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	247 338
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1905 1039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.861 7.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	235.463 460.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.463 0.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.918 23.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.551 53.346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1564 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3260 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1564 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3260 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3347

Compare specifications (specs)