AMD Radeon HD 6670 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6670 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 4.3x more pipelines: 480 vs 112
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 724 vs 454
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 247 vs 56
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 2845
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3304
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 2845
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 April 2011 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 724 vs 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 vs 56 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 vs 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 vs 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 724 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 56 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.861 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1564 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1564 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3304 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6670 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Turks | G92 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch date | 19 April 2011 | 21 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $160 |
| Place in performance rating | 1255 | 1063 |
| Price now | $102.99 | $103.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.12 | 8.86 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 754 million |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6670 with others
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4890
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2800M
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
ATIFirePro M7820
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7570
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M
AMDRadeon HD 6670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7620G IGP
