AMD Radeon HD 7570 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570 and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 640 MHz
• Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 624 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 614 vs 526
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 vs 232
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 vs 185.752
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.033 vs 9.023
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 vs 16.137
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1389 vs 899
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 1255
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2037
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1389 vs 899
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 1255
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2037

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2100 vs 1550
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.617 vs 4.874
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.526 vs 0.487

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	614 526
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	256 232
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1550 2100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.874 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	259.769 185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.487 0.526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.033 9.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.396 16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1389 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2724 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 2037
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1389 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2724 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 2037

Compare specifications (specs)