AMD Radeon HD 7670M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7670M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 264 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 384 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 473 vs 328
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 2160
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 2160
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 February 2012 vs 28 April 2008 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 264 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 384 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 473 vs 328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 2160 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 26.4 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 97 vs 91
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 26.4 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 97 vs 91 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7670M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 473 | 328 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 91 | 97 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.47 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.901 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1228 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2194 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1228 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2194 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 2160 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7670M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Thames | G92 |
| Launch date | 17 February 2012 | 28 April 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $629.99 | $49.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1402 | 1405 |
| Price now | $629.99 | $49.99 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.48 | 13.43 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 264 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 26.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 384 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, (GDDR5) | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7670M with others
AMDRadeon HD 7670M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
AMDRadeon HD 7670M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 260
AMDRadeon HD 7670M vs
ATIFirePro V3800
AMDRadeon HD 7670M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M
AMDRadeon HD 7670M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1000M
AMDRadeon HD 7670M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625 OEM
