NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and AMD Radeon HD 7670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 779 vs 473
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 91
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1717 vs 1416
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.636 vs 2.47
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 17 February 2012 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 779 vs 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 vs 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1717 vs 1416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.636 vs 2.47 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670M
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
- Around 76% better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 210.901 vs 115.549
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1228 vs 1162
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2194 vs 1695
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 2297
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1228 vs 1162
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2194 vs 1695
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 2297
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.901 vs 115.549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1228 vs 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2194 vs 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 2297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1228 vs 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2194 vs 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 2297 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | AMD Radeon HD 7670M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 779 | 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1717 | 1416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.636 | 2.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 115.549 | 210.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1695 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2297 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1695 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2297 | 3341 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | AMD Radeon HD 7670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Thames |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 17 February 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.90 | $629.99 |
Place in performance rating | 1402 | 1404 |
Price now | $149.90 | $629.99 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.18 | 1.48 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, (GDDR5) |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |