NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs AMD Radeon HD 7670M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and AMD Radeon HD 7670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 42% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 779 vs 473
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 91
  • Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1717 vs 1416
  • Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.636 vs 2.47
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 June 2012 vs 17 February 2012
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 779 vs 473
PassMark - G2D Mark 250 vs 91
Geekbench - OpenCL 1717 vs 1416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.636 vs 2.47

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670M

  • Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
  • Around 76% better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 210.901 vs 115.549
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1228 vs 1162
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2194 vs 1695
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 2297
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1228 vs 1162
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2194 vs 1695
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 2297
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 480 vs 192
Floating-point performance 576.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 210.901 vs 115.549
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1228 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2194 vs 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3341 vs 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1228 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2194 vs 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3341 vs 2297

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
779
473
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
250
91
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1717
1416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.636
2.47
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
115.549
210.901
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1162
1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1695
2194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2297
3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1162
1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1695
2194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2297
3341
Name NVIDIA Quadro K1000M AMD Radeon HD 7670M
PassMark - G3D Mark 779 473
PassMark - G2D Mark 250 91
Geekbench - OpenCL 1717 1416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.636 2.47
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 115.549 210.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1162 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1695 2194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2297 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1162 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1695 2194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2297 3341
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M AMD Radeon HD 7670M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale 2
Code name GK107 Thames
Launch date 1 June 2012 17 February 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $119.90 $629.99
Place in performance rating 1402 1404
Price now $149.90 $629.99
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 6.18 1.48

Technical info

Core clock speed 850 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops 576.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 192 480
Texture fill rate 13.6 GTexel / s 14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 716 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, (GDDR5)
Shared memory 0 0