AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and AMD Radeon R7 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 369380.3x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
- 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 359 vs 33.5
- 40.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1386 vs 33.9
- 51.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 60
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s vs 16.46 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 vs 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 vs 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 vs 60 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 30.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 737
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 359
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1386
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3112
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 vs 1386 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3112 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 316 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 737 | 22612 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 359 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 | 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 | 2101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 | 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 | 60 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Scrapper Lite | Wani |
| Launch date | July 2013 | 31 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1379 | 1435 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 2 | |
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 194.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 128 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3040 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 4 | |
| Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s | 16.46 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 8 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,303 million | 2,410 million |
| Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP with others
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GS
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
