AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 4.5x more texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
• 17.8x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 939 vs 347
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 284 vs 194
• 10.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5799 vs 538
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.771 vs 8.712
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.896 vs 155.638
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.219 vs 0.931
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.949 vs 7.36
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 vs 12.009
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1759 vs 754
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2540 vs 1492
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2392
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1759 vs 754
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2540 vs 1492
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	939 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	284 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5799 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.771 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	285.896 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.219 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.949 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.899 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1759 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2540 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1759 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2540 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 2392

Compare specifications (specs)