AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 18.6 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 384 vs 32
- 6x better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1013 vs 173
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 202 vs 135
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2337
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2337
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 February 2013 vs 1 October 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 18.6 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops vs 99.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1013 vs 173 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 vs 135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 620 MHz
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1013 | 173 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 | 135 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Mars | G96 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 26 February 2013 | 1 October 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1298 | 1301 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 99.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 18.6 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 314 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |