NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs AMD Radeon HD 8750M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K610M and AMD Radeon HD 8750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K610M

AMD Radeon HD 8750M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 58% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 620 MHz
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 203
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 2221
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 2221

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 26 February 2013
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 620 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	219 vs 203
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2253 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2253 vs 2221

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M

Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 18.6 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
Around 58% better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1009 vs 718
2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5747 vs 1993
Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 271.177 vs 182.093
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.596 vs 20.881
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 1123
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3195
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 1123
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3195

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	18.6 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	595.2 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1009 vs 718
Geekbench - OpenCL	5747 vs 1993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	271.177 vs 182.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.596 vs 20.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1734 vs 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351 vs 3195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1734 vs 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351 vs 3195

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8750M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

718

1009

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

219

203

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1993

5747

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

182.093

271.177

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20.881

70.596

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1123

1734

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2253

2221

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3195

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1123

1734

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2253

2221

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3195

3351

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K610M	AMD Radeon HD 8750M
PassMark - G3D Mark	718	1009
PassMark - G2D Mark	219	203
Geekbench - OpenCL	1993	5747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	182.093	271.177
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0	1.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	20.881	70.596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1123	1734
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2253	2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3195	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1123	1734
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2253	2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3195	3351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		24.834
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K610M	AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK208	Mars
Launch date	23 July 2013	26 February 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$229.99
Place in performance rating	1298	1300
Price now	$75
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	11.43
Design		AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series
Technical info
Core clock speed	980 MHz	620 MHz
Floating-point performance	376.3 gflops	595.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	384
Texture fill rate	15.68 GTexel / s	18.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt
Transistor count	1270 Million	1,040 million
Boost clock speed		775 MHz
Compute units		6
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	11
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	20.8 GB / s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus