AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 26% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 732 MHz
  • Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 219 Watt
  • Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
  • Around 84% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 3800 MHz
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 36.208
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 123.354
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 June 2017 vs 7 December 2010
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 732 MHz
Pipelines 512 vs 480
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 219 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1280 MB
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 3800 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 46.988 vs 36.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 139.235 vs 123.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709 vs 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709 vs 3705

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

  • Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
  • Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.499 vs 30.848
  • Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 708.853 vs 438.581
  • Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 vs 2.268
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 vs 3241
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 vs 3241
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 43.92 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 1,405 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.499 vs 30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 708.853 vs 438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.967 vs 2.268
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5405 vs 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5405 vs 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3350

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.848
36.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
438.581
708.853
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.268
3.967
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
46.988
36.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
139.235
123.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3241
5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3241
5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
3357
Name AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
PassMark - G3D Mark 1850
PassMark - G2D Mark 389
Geekbench - OpenCL 10245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.848 36.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 438.581 708.853
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.268 3.967
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 46.988 36.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 139.235 123.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3241 5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3241 5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 3357

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Lexa GF110
Launch date 12 June 2017 7 December 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $149 $349
Place in performance rating 820 817
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1219 MHz
Core clock speed 925 MHz 732 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,248 gflops 1,405 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 512 480
Texture fill rate 39.01 GTexel / s 43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 219 Watt
Transistor count 2,200 million 3,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1280 MB
Memory bandwidth 56 GB / s 152.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 320 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz 3800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5