AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 9% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 846 MHz
2.9x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
3.8x better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1832 vs 641
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 1087
Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 2012
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3071
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 1087
Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 2012
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1832 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3071

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

2.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 402

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	441 vs 402

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1832

641

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

402

441

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3071

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3071

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1832	641
PassMark - G2D Mark	402	441
Geekbench - OpenCL	10229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3071

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Lexa	GK208
Launch date	12 June 2017	23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	804	835
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	846 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	192
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	13.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	1270 Million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	56 GB / s	19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus