AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 350 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 84 Watt
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2515 vs 605
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9971 vs 3385
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.959 vs 8.915
- 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 vs 146.479
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.893 vs 1.178
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 vs 10.689
- 18.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 122.245 vs 6.64
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3607 vs 3342
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3607 vs 3342
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 1 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 84 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2515 vs 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9971 vs 3385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 vs 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 vs 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 vs 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 vs 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 vs 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3345 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1219 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 415
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1219 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 vs 415 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2515 | 605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 963 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9971 | 3385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Lexa | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 1 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 721 | 685 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 84 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |