AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1098 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 415 vs 339
Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9994 vs 8148
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 vs 782.113

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 3 December 2015
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1098 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	415 vs 339
Geekbench - OpenCL	9994 vs 8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	864.134 vs 782.113
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3467 vs 2515
Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 29.959
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 2.893
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 49.305
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.268 vs 122.245
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 4551
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3607
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 4551
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3607

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3467 vs 2515
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281 vs 29.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5 vs 2.893
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048 vs 49.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	171.268 vs 122.245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920 vs 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920 vs 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3607

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2515

3467

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

415

339

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9994

8148

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.959

47.281

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

864.134

782.113

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.893

3.5

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

49.305

51.048

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

122.245

171.268

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4551

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3607

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4551

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3607

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3355

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2515	3467
PassMark - G2D Mark	415	339
Geekbench - OpenCL	9994	8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	29.959	47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	864.134	782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.893	3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	49.305	51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	122.245	171.268
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4551	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3607	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4551	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3607	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3355

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Lexa	GM107
Launch date	12 June 2017	3 December 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	721	702
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1098 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	1029 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	1,405 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	640
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB / s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus