AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 versus AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 versus 3611.018
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 versus 12980
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 versus 12980
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 versus 3611.018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 versus 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 versus 12980 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1382 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1600 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 409.6 GTexel / s versus 384.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 13,107 gflops versus 12,288 gflops
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13040 versus 12361
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 737 versus 724
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 76041 versus 65451
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 versus 174.714
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.789 versus 17.305
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 versus 175.219
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 versus 1226.861
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1382 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 409.6 GTexel / s versus 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops versus 12,288 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13040 versus 12361 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 737 versus 724 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76041 versus 65451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 versus 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 versus 17.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 versus 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 versus 1226.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12361 | 13040 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 737 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65451 | 76041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 | 190.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 | 3611.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 | 17.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 181.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 | 1373.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7074 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 10 July 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,599 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 209 | 210 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz | 1382 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | 13,107 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 4096 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s | 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 12,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB / s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 avec des autres
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100 vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100 vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
