AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

AMD Radeon R9 290

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 947 MHz
660.1x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
3.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 275 Watt
2.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7730 vs 6300
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7730 vs 6300

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 5 November 2013
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 947 MHz
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 275 Watt
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730 vs 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730 vs 6300

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290

2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 29430
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3595
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3595
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 615
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8300 vs 5957

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2560 vs 1280
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	102277 vs 29430
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3711 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3711 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3350
PassMark - G2D Mark	776 vs 615
PassMark - G3D Mark	8300 vs 5957

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29430

102277

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

6300

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

6300

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3354

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

615

776

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5957

8300

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	AMD Radeon R9 290
Geekbench - OpenCL	29430	102277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730	6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730	6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3354
PassMark - G2D Mark	615	776
PassMark - G3D Mark	5957	8300
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		89.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1366.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		10.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		98.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		540.645
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3684

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	AMD Radeon R9 290
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Navi 14	Hawaii
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	5 November 2013
Place in performance rating	362	360
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$399
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz
Compute units	20
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	947 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	2560
Pixel fill rate	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s	151.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	6,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,849 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		275 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	320.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)