AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 910.7x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5996 vs 5427
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 25 August 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 vs 5427 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 5% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1280
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8276 vs 7730
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8276 vs 7730
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3595
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3595
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 617
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 1280 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8276 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8276 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3350 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 617 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 | 694 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 | 5427 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 25 August 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 354 | 307 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1344 |
| Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5300M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
ATIFireGL V7700
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla M6
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla P4
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
