AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA Quadro M5000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz
Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1038 MHz
752.4x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 150 Watt
Around 81% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29471 vs 28292
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3324
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3324

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 29 June 2015
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 861 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	29471 vs 28292
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3324
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3324

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000

Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12524 vs 7730
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12524 vs 7730
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3677 vs 3595
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3677 vs 3595
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 615
Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9391 vs 5995

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2048 vs 1280
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12524 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12524 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3677 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3677 vs 3595
PassMark - G2D Mark	659 vs 615
PassMark - G3D Mark	9391 vs 5995

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29471

28292

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

12524

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

12524

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3677

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3677

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3324

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3324

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

615

659

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5995

9391

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Geekbench - OpenCL	29471	28292
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730	12524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730	12524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595	3677
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595	3677
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3324
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3324
PassMark - G2D Mark	615	659
PassMark - G3D Mark	5995	9391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		99.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1183.119
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		53.364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		498.551

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 14	GM204
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	29 June 2015
Place in performance rating	354	342
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,856.99
Price now		$1,498
Value for money (0-100)		7.47
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1038 MHz
Compute units	20
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	861 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	2048
Pixel fill rate	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s	132.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	5,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,252 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Length		267 mm
SLI options		1
Width		2" (5.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	256 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management