AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 617 vs 452
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 vs 452 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 100 GTexel/s
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 29459
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 7730
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3595
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7153 vs 5996
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 100 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 29459 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3350 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7153 vs 5996 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29459 | 38863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 | 452 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 | 7153 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 354 | 368 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | 114.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.311 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5300M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
ATIFireGL V7700
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla M6
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla P4
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
