AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 797 MHz
Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 902 MHz
461.9x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29471 vs 22920
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 617 vs 543

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 797 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 902 MHz
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	29471 vs 22920
PassMark - G2D Mark	617 vs 543

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 7730
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 7730
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3595
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3595
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8059 vs 5996

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2880 vs 1280
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12657 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12657 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3711 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3711 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3350
PassMark - G3D Mark	8059 vs 5996

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29471

22920

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

12657

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

12657

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3356

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

617

543

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5996

8059

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Geekbench - OpenCL	29471	22920
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730	12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730	12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3356
PassMark - G2D Mark	617	543
PassMark - G3D Mark	5996	8059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		355.166

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Navi 14	GK110B
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	354	361
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,265
Price now		$833.98
Value for money (0-100)		11.34
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	902 MHz
Compute units	20
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	2880
Pixel fill rate	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s	216.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		5,196 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5